Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Am J Epidemiol ; 192(6): 851-852, 2023 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233380
2.
Vaccine ; 41(29): 4327-4334, 2023 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20230772

ABSTRACT

We prospectively examined the association between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle characteristics in an internet-based prospective cohort study. We included a sample of 1,137 participants who enrolled in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a preconception cohort study of couples trying to conceive, during January 2021-August 2022. Eligible participants were aged 21-45 years, United States or Canadian residents, and trying to conceive without fertility treatment. At baseline and every 8 weeks for up to 12 months, participants completed questionnaires on which they provided information on COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle characteristics, including cycle regularity, cycle length, bleed length, heaviness of bleed, and menstrual pain. We fit generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with a log link function and Poisson distribution to estimate the adjusted risk ratio (RR) for irregular cycles associated with COVID-19 vaccination. We used linear regression with GEE to estimate adjusted mean differences in menstrual cycle length associated with COVID-19 vaccination. We adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, medical and reproductive factors. Participants had 1.1 day longer menstrual cycles after receiving the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (95 % CI: 0.4, 1.9) and 1.3 day longer cycles after receiving the second dose (95 % CI: 0.2, 2.5). Associations were attenuated at the second cycle post-vaccination. We did not observe strong associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cycle regularity, bleed length, heaviness of bleed, or menstrual pain. In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a ∼1 day temporary increase in menstrual cycle length, but was not appreciably associated with other menstrual cycle characteristics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Dysmenorrhea , Canada/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Menstrual Cycle , Vaccination
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 192(6): 849-850, 2023 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2311584

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been reported to have a short-term effect on the menstrual cycle, delaying the onset of the next menses. However, the analytical methods that have been used to study this are subject to a statistical phenomenon called "length-biased sampling" that calls the results into question. Those data are important and should be reanalyzed in an unbiased way.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Menstrual Cycle , Time Factors , Vaccination
5.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 18: 17455057221109375, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310497

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: After COVID-19 vaccination, women of reproductive age reported changes in their menstrual cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out after a survey on social networks that included women aged 18-41 years with normal cycles according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and who were vaccinated (complete schedule for two doses, except J&J/Janssen or incomplete with a single dose). Women with following conditions were excluded: pregnant or lactating women; history of diseases that cause menstrual irregularities or early menopause: anorexia, bulimia, polycystic ovary syndrome, hypothyroidism, obesity, or low weight; hysterectomized or oophorectomized patients; and high performance athletes. RESULTS: Overall, 950 women completed the survey between July and September 2021. In total, 408 women met the inclusion criteria, and 184 reported the following characteristics: frequency (normal 43.47%, infrequent 25%, and frequent 31.53%), regularity (regular 51.08%, irregular 42.93%, and absent/amenorrhea 5.97%), duration (normal 65.21%, prolonged 26.08%, absent/amenorrhea 8.69%), and volume (heavy 41.84%, light 20.65%, and absent/amenorrhea 6.52%). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination can influence the menstrual cycle and cause alterations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Menstruation Disturbances , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle , Menstruation Disturbances/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
8.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 26(1): 153-161, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2262362

ABSTRACT

The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations on menstrual cycle and ovarian reserve in reproductive aged-women. Health care providers (n = 258) vaccinated with inactivated (CoronaVac) and mRNA based (Pfizer-BioNTech®) COVID-19 vaccines were included. All subjects completed a gynaecological and menstrual history questionnaire and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels were measured in serum samples collected before first vaccination and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 9th months. The prevalence of new-onset menstrual dysregulation following vaccination was 20.6% and it was statistically significant compared to baseline (p = 0.001). Menstrual pattern turned back to normal in 59.6% of vaccinated women. Serum AMH levels gradually decreased until 6th month of follow-up compared to baseline (p < 0.001). A significant increase in serum AMH level was observed at 9th month of follow-up compared to 6th month follow-up levels (p < 0.001). The decrease in serum AMH level was statistically significant regardless of serum anti SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, subgroups of age, occupation, menstrual dysregulation following vaccination and presence of gynaecological diseases. In conclusion, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 causes a transient decrease on serum AMH levels and moderate irregularities in menstrual pattern increasing with age and is mostly reversible.


Subject(s)
Anti-Mullerian Hormone , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Menstrual Cycle
10.
Alcohol (Hanover) ; 47(1): 127-142, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Females who misuse alcohol experience high rates of negative physical and mental health consequences. Existing findings are inconsistent but suggest a relationship between ovarian hormones and alcohol use. We aim to clarify how alcohol use and drinking motives vary across the menstrual cycle in female psychiatric outpatients using the luteinizing hormone (LH)-confirmed cycle phase. METHODS: Daily self-reports (n = 3721) were collected from 94 naturally cycling females, recruited for past-month suicidal ideation, during the baseline phase of three parent clinical trials between February 2017 and May 2022. Multilevel logistic and linear models estimated the relationship between the cycle phase (with LH-surge confirmed ovulation) and daily alcohol use or drinking motives, moderated by the weekend. Models were adjusted for age, legal drinking status, substance use disorder, and the COVID-19 pandemic, and included random effects. RESULTS: Participants were generally more likely to drink in the midluteal (vs. perimenstrual) phase, but more likely to drink heavily on weekends in periovulatory and perimenstrual (vs. midluteal) phases. Social motives for drinking were significantly higher on weekends in the periovulatory, mid-follicular, and midluteal phases (vs. weekdays), but this finding was non-significant in the perimenstrual phase. Participants rated drinking to cope higher in the perimenstrual phase (vs. midluteal phase), regardless of the weekend. CONCLUSION: In a psychiatric sample with LH-surge-confirmed ovulation, we find an increased likelihood to drink heavily in periovulatory and perimenstrual phases on weekends. We also find that the perimenstrual phase is associated with increased drinking to cope, and relatively lower weekend social drinking. Finally, random effects across models suggest individual differences in the extent to which the cycle influences drinking. Our findings stress (1) predictable phases of increased high-risk alcohol use across the menstrual cycle, and (2) the importance of individual assessment of cyclical changes in alcohol use to predict and prevent ovulation- and menses-related surges in heavy drinking.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Outpatients , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Menstrual Cycle , Luteinizing Hormone , Alcohol Drinking
11.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 26(1): 146-152, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249283

ABSTRACT

Due to the paucity of literature on COVID-19 and menstrual irregularities, this study aims to investigate the effect of COVID-19 infection on menstrual changes in premenopausal women within the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. A cross-sectional investigation utilizing a self-administered online questionnaire was conducted between July and August of 2021. A total of 499 females participated in our survey with a mean age of 35.2 ± 8.4 years. The majority of participants had regular periods (74.1%) and were disease free (81.6%). Mild, moderate, and severe symptoms were documented in 58.9%, 26.7%, and 3.0% of the studied cohort, respectively. Females experienced significantly more menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 infection than during the pandemic prior to infection (p < 0.001). Those females were significantly older (p = 0.031), had more severe symptoms (p = 0.029), and were more likely to have experienced irregularities during the epidemic (p < 0.001). COVID-19 infection seems to induce menstrual abnormalities in premenopausal females. These abnormalities could manifest as increased frequency or severity and are associated with older women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Aged , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Africa, Northern/epidemiology , Middle East/epidemiology , Menstrual Cycle
12.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(3): 1185-1191, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 vaccination has been linked to numerous reports of menstrual disorders as potential side effects. However, menstrual cycle results after vaccination were not collected throughout clinical trials. According to other research, COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual disorders have no discernible connection, and menstrual disorders are temporary. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We asked questions about menstruation disturbances following the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in a population-based cohort of adult Saudi women to determine whether the vaccination is linked to menstrual cycle irregularities. RESULTS: According to the results, 63.9% of women experienced variations in their menstrual cycle either after the first or second dose. Such results show that COVID-19 vaccination impacts women's menstrual cycles. However, there is no need for concern because the alterations are relatively minor, and the menstrual cycle usually returns to normal within two months. Additionally, there are no obvious distinctions between the various vaccine types or body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support and explain the self-reports of menstrual cycle variations. We have discussed reasons for these problems that describe the mechanism of the relationship between them and the immune response. Such reasons will help prevent hormonal imbalances and the influence of therapies and immunizations on the reproductive system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Female , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/pharmacology , Menstruation Disturbances , Menstrual Cycle
13.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(11): 2903-2910, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 vaccine is effective in preventing severe cases of COVID-19. For women, gynecological adverse events, such as menstrual irregularities and irregular bleeding, could be a concern after COVID-19 vaccination. In this study, we investigated gynecological adverse events in the vaccinated Japanese female population. METHODS: We conducted a survey-based study with health-care workers, including medical doctors and nurses, medical coworkers, and medical university faculty, staff, and students, at a single medical school and affiliated hospital in Japan. We used McNemar's test and network analysis. RESULTS: Overall, we obtained 819 responses, and 424 were from females. After the exclusion of contradictory answers, 309 surveys were finally considered appropriate for the analysis. The frequencies of abnormal bleeding were 0.6%, 1.0%, and 3.0% for the first, second, and third doses, respectively. An irregular menstrual cycle was more common than abnormal bleeding: 1.9%, 4.9%, and 6.6% for the first, second, and third doses, respectively. Network analysis revealed that abnormal bleeding and an irregular menstrual cycle were not associated with other adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on menstruation seem limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , Menstruation Disturbances , Menstrual Cycle
14.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(1)2022 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244132

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in heightened stress for many individuals, with women reporting more stress than men. Although a large body of evidence has demonstrated that stress, in general, can impact the menstrual cycle, it is not yet clear if COVID-specific stress would impact women's menstrual health. The current study explored the relationship between COVID-related stress and distress and menstrual variables (menstrual pain, number and severity of menstrual symptoms, and menstrual pain interference) in a sample of reproductive-age adult women. Seven-hundred fifteen women completed the initial survey and were re-contacted to complete the same survey three months later. Of those recontacted, 223 completed the follow-up survey. Results indicated that COVID-related stress and distress was associated with higher levels of menstrual pain, more frequent and more severe menstrual symptoms, and greater menstrual pain interference, even after accounting for age, hormonal use, bodily pain, and pain catastrophizing. Our findings suggest that women experience unique vulnerabilities that directly impact their health and functioning, and both research and clinical care should address these symptoms through careful assessment and treatment of menstrual pain and symptoms, particularly during and after periods of high stress and distress.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dysmenorrhea , Male , Adult , Humans , Female , Dysmenorrhea/epidemiology , Dysmenorrhea/etiology , Dysmenorrhea/drug therapy , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Menstruation , Women's Health , Menstrual Cycle , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Fertil Steril ; 119(3): 392-400, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2240618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of people who experience changes to their menstrual cycle after COVID-19 vaccination. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. PATIENT(S): We recruited a volunteer sample with and without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who enrolled in the Arizona COVID-19 Cohort (CoVHORT) study and participated in a reproductive sub-cohort who were pre-menopausal, not pregnant, and had received a COVID-19 vaccine in 2021 (n = 545). EXPOSURE(S): Demographic and reproductive characteristics were collected via self-reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Information on self-reported changes in the menstrual cycle after COVID-19 vaccination was collected from May 2021 to December 2021. We looked at demographic and reproductive characteristics as predictors of menstrual cycle change. RESULT(S): The majority of our vaccinated sample received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (58%), and were 26-35 years old (51%), non-Hispanic (84%), and White (88%). Approximately 25% of vaccinated participants reported a change in their menstrual cycle after vaccination; the majority reported changes after their second dose (56%) as compared with their first (18%) and third (14%) doses. The most commonly reported changes were irregular menstruation (43%), increased premenstrual symptoms (34%), increased menstrual pain or cramps (30%), and abnormally heavy or prolonged bleeding (31%). High self-reported perceived stress levels compared with low perceived stress (OR, 2.22; 95% CI 1.12-4.37) and greater body mass index (OR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.07) were associated with greater odds of experiencing the menstrual cycle changes after the vaccination. Participants having a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were less likely to report changes in their menstrual cycle after vaccination compared with the participants with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.32-1.04). CONCLUSION(S): Among vaccinated participants, approximately 25% of them reported predominantly temporary changes in the menstrual cycle, however, we are unable to determine whether these changes are due to normal cycle variability. The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for everyone, including pregnant people and people trying to conceive; hence, these findings should not discourage vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Longitudinal Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Menstrual Cycle , Vaccination
16.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0279408, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197094

ABSTRACT

Temporary changes in the menstrual cycle have recently been reported following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In the current study, we aimed to screen menstrual cycle changes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in Saudi Arabia. The type and duration of these changes have been screened in relation to the severity of coronavirus disease symptoms and vaccination status. In total, 956 individuals responded: sixty-nine did not get the COVID-19 vaccine, while the remaining were vaccinated with either a single dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine (n:45) or BNT162b2 vaccine (n: 142) or two doses of the vaccine (n:700) using BNT162b2 (n:477), ChAdOx1 (n:89) or ChAdOx1/ BNT162b2 (n:134). Approximately 26.1% (18/69) of the subjects who did not receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and 15.3% (29/188) and 26.4% (185/700) of the subjects who received single and double doses of the vaccines, respectively, reported menstrual cycle changes. The persistence of menstrual cycle changes for more than six months was reported by 6.4% (61/956) of the participants. These changes were significantly correlated with the severity of COVID-19 infection. We concluded that menstrual cycle changes, associated with COVID-19 infection, increase due to the severity of COVID-19 infection. Thus, menstrual cycle changes are among the long-term effects associated with COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , BNT162 Vaccine , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Menstrual Cycle , Vaccination
17.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(5): 513-518, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165565

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although several studies have investigated the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and the menstrual cycle, available data are limited. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of COVID-19 vaccines on the menstrual cycle and the effect of the menstrual cycle phase on the vaccine side effects during vaccine administration in Japan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on the date of vaccination; type of vaccine; type, grade, and duration of the side effects; regularity of menstruation; normal length of the menstrual cycle; and the day one date of menstruation around vaccination. The survey was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS: The difference between the predicted and actual menstrual cycle length was 1.9 ± 3.0, 1.6 ± 2.8 (p = 0.557), and 2.5 ± 3.8 (p = 0.219) days before vaccination and after the first and second dose of the vaccine, respectively. In participants who received vaccinations twice within a single menstrual cycle, this difference was 1.3 ± 3.5 and 3.9 ± 3.3 (p = 0.045) days before and after vaccination, respectively. The grade and proportion of the side effects after the second dose of the vaccine was highest during the menstrual period and lowest during the ovulation period, with a significant effect on headache and chills. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines tended to prolong the menstrual cycle. The side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine tended to be at a maximum when vaccination occurred during the menstrual period and minimal during the ovulation period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , East Asian People , COVID-19/prevention & control , Menstrual Cycle , Menstruation , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 974788, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2121063

ABSTRACT

Observations of women and clinicians indicated that the prevalence of menstrual cycle problems has escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it was not clear whether the observed menstrual cycle changes were related to vaccination, the disease itself or the COVID-19 pandemic-induced psychological alterations. To systematically analyze this question, we conducted a human online survey in women aged between 18 and 65 in Hungary. The menstrual cycle of 1563 individuals were analyzed in our study in relation to the COVID-19 vaccination, the COVID-19 infection, the pandemic itself and the mental health. We found no association between the COVID-19 vaccination, the vaccine types or the COVID-19 infection and the menstrual cycle changes. We also evaluated the menstrual cycle alterations focusing on three parameters of the menstrual cycle including the cycle length, the menses length and the cycle regularity in three pandemic phases: the pre-peak, the peak and the post-peak period in Hungary. Our finding was that the length of the menstrual cycle did not change in any of the periods. However, the menses length increased, while the regularity of the menstrual cycle decreased significantly during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic when comparing to the pre- and post-peak periods. In addition, we exhibited that the length and the regularity of the menstrual cycle both correlated with the severity of depression during the post-peak period, therefore we concluded that the reported menstrual cycle abnormalities during the peak of COVID-19 in Hungary might be the result of elevated depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics , Hungary/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Menstrual Cycle/psychology , Vaccination
19.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(20)2022 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2081876

ABSTRACT

This research investigated the implications that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the menstrual cycle and any contributing factors to these changes. A questionnaire was completed by 559 eumenorrheic participants, capturing detail on menstrual cycle symptoms and characteristics prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period. Over half of all participants reported to have experienced lack of motivation (61.5%), focus (54.7%) and concentration (57.8%). 52.8% of participants reported an increase in cycle length. Specifically, there was an increase in the median cycle length reported of 5 days (minimum 2 days, maximum 32 days), with a median decrease of 3 days (minimum 2 days and maximum 17 days). A lack of focus was significantly associated with a change in menstrual cycle length (p = 0.038) reported to have increased by 61% of participants. Changes to eating patterns of white meat (increase p = 0.035, decrease p = 0.003) and processed meat (increase p = 0.002 and decrease p = 0.001) were significantly associated with a change in menstrual cycle length. It is important that females and practitioners become aware of implications of environmental stressors and the possible long-term effects on fertility. Future research should continue to investigate any long-lasting changes in symptoms, as well as providing education and support for females undergoing any life stressors that may implicate their menstrual cycle and/or symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , Menstrual Cycle , Life Style
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL